Home   News   Article

Grantham fisherman wins court battle against Lincolnshire County Council over parking bye-law charges




Court news.
Court news.

A sea fisherman has overturned two parking convictions after he was prosecuted for breaching a controversial bye-law introduced by Lincolnshire County Council.

Alexander Sprott, 34, of Ascot Drive, Grantham was taken to court by Lincolnshire County Council after being accused of illegally leaving his van overnight in a coastal car park at Huttoft Carr Terrace, in breach of the recently introduced local bye-law.

The regulation was brought in to prevent campervanners from parking overnight, but fishermen are exempt provided they don’t sleep on site and the vehicle is less than 1.9 metres high.

Mr Sprott was originally convicted by Boston Magistrates of two breaches of the bye-laws on May 11 and July 5, 2014 and was given a £830 penalty for fines and costs.

However Mr Sprott took the case to appeal at Lincoln Crown Court where he represented himself in front of a judge and two magistrates. After a 90 minute hearing he was cleared of both offences and awarded £669 costs against the county council.

LCC claimed Mr Sprott’s VW van contravened the fishing permit regulations because it was too high and they claimed he had slept in his van.

But at the appeal Matthew Davey, the authority’s environment and community projects officer, admitted the van was never measured and instead he relied on details supplied by the manufacturer.

Mr Sprott told the court that a police officer who later measured the vehicle found it was only 1.84m high and so not in breach of the regulation.

PC Zara Springall, who served the notice on July 5, admitted she only tapped lightly on the windscreen before she slapped the ticket on the vehicle at 2am. She said it was “possible” the occupant was asleep because she received no answer, but she could not be sure.

Mr Sprott said he did not hear her knock as he was inside his van listening to music on his headphones while tidying up after fishing.

Mr Sprott told the appeal hearing that the first fixed penalty notice issued on May 11 was simply a warning and he immediately took appropriate action in obtaining a fishing permit. He argued that he should never have been prosecuted for that matter, as it was simply a warning.

Judge Rosemary Coe QC, in delivering the decision of the bench, said in relation to the July 5 ticket, the council had not established that Mr Sprott’s van breached the 1.9 metre high regulation.

She added: “We find that they [the county council] have not established, so that we are sure, that the appellant was asleep. Having heard the evidence of the appellant we are a long way from being sure that he was asleep.”

The Judge ruled that prosecution for the May 11 ticket was an abuse of process as the warning notice given to Mr Sprott said he would only be prosecuted for any future breach of the rules.

She said: “We are satisfied that this first prosecution should never have been prosecuted. The notice clearly states that this was a first offence and would be treated as a warning. We have not doubt that this was an abuse of process.”

Mr Sprott said: “I enjoy my weekends at the coast. I spend most of my free money there. I’m a very keen sea angler and I’ve been going to that beach for years.

“I’m a law-abiding citizen.The council has wasted thousands of pounds of taxpayers money. I’m elated to have won. It’s a great relief. This has been going on for over a year.”

LCC introduced byelaws to restrict overnight parking in response to complaints from local residents.

After the case Matthew Davey, LCC’s environment and community projects officer, said: “We are, of course, disappointed with the decision. However, we will continue to monitor the car parks over the summer and seek to continue to enforce the bye-laws.”



COMMENTS
()


Iliffe Media does not moderate comments. Please click here for our house rules.

People who post abusive comments about other users or those featured in articles will be banned.

Thank you. Your comment has been received and will appear on the site shortly.

 

Terms of Comments

We do not actively moderate, monitor or edit contributions to the reader comments but we may intervene and take such action as we think necessary, please click here for our house rules.

If you have any concerns over the contents on our site, please either register those concerns using the report abuse button, contact us here.

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies - Learn More