Home   News   Article

Grantham Journal letter: Confused by anti-war stance


The interesting anti-war diatribe by John Andrews last week still leaves me a little confused as to whether he is a pacifist, conspiracy theorist or armchair lawyer; possibly a combination of all three.

His argument about the legality of ‘war’ is as specious as the legality of terrorism.

Judges and juries usually decide if a law has been broken and these laws are sanctioned democratically by individual or groups of nations, ie. the UN. This system usually works with civilised democratic nations all agreeing on a compromise or consensus.However, the forces of evil that drive most terrorism, whether they be idealistic cults, religous or political extremism, are a law unto themselves.

The question I have for Mr Andrews is: “Does religious dogma or ‘law’ overide a democratically agreed law ?” As I hope he can therefore see the argument about the legitimacy of war is a mere distraction and incidental to the survival of our civilised world and Christian humanity.

Rod Hatherill,

Lodge Way,



Iliffe Media does not moderate comments. Please click here for our house rules.

People who post abusive comments about other users or those featured in articles will be banned.

Thank you. Your comment has been received and will appear on the site shortly.


Terms of Comments

We do not actively moderate, monitor or edit contributions to the reader comments but we may intervene and take such action as we think necessary, please click here for our house rules.

If you have any concerns over the contents on our site, please either register those concerns using the report abuse button, contact us here.

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies - Learn More